Advisory Opinion: 1821

Year Issued: 1998

RPC(s): RPC 1.4; 1.6; 1.7(b); 1.15; 4.3

Subject: Formation of attorney-client relationship; conflict of interest; adverse party leaves lawyer detailed voice mail message about potential lawsuit against current client


The Committee researched and reviewed your inquiry concerning the responsibility of a lawyer to his own client and to a caller who leaves a detailed message about the caller’s possible law suit against the lawyer’s client on lawyer’s answering machine when seeking to hire the lawyer and determined the following:

As you point out in your letter, answering your question requires first a determination whether a client-lawyer relationship exists. That is a legal question and this Committee is prohibited from giving opinions on legal questions.

To resolve this question for yourself, you may want to read the Preamble to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and In re McGlothlen, 99 Wn.2d 515, 663 P.2d 1330 (1983); Bohn v. Cody, 119 Wn.2d 712, 862 P.2d 117 (1992); and State v. Hansen, 122 Wn.2d 712, 862 P.2d 117 (1993).

If you conclude that you have no client-lawyer relationship with the caller, then your obligation to the caller is prescribed by RPC 4.3 and it is the Committee’s opinion that your secretary’s call to the caller satisfied that requirement. Your obligation to your own client, the company, would be prescribed by RPC 1.4 and you would be required to inform the company of the pending lawsuit.

If you conclude that you do have a client-lawyer relationship with the caller, then your obligations are prescribed by RPC 1.6, 1.7(b) and 1.15(a)(i). You will have to keep the content of the call confidential and you will have to decline to represent the company in the caller’s lawsuit.

***

Advisory Opinions are provided for the education of the Bar and reflect the opinion of the Committee on Professional Ethics (CPE) or its predecessors. Advisory Opinions are provided pursuant to the authorization granted by the Board of Governors, but are not individually approved by the Board and do not reflect the official position of the Bar association. Laws other than the Washington State Rules of Professional Conduct may apply to the inquiry. The Committee's answer does not include or opine about any other applicable law other than the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct.