Advisory Opinion:
2208
Year Issued:
2010
RPC(s):
1.8(m)(1)(ii)
Subject:
Lawyer paying costs of routine investigation services under county contract
Under its rules of procedure, the RPC Committee does not generally opine on past conduct, and will not do so here. Moreover, the Committee is not in a position to assess the reasonableness of the funding in a contract for public defender services or to involve itself in the negotiations over the terms of such a contract, and declines to do so here. However, because future conduct also appears to be implicated in the inquiry, the Committee is in a position to advise the inquiring lawyer that RPC 1.8(m)(1)(ii) requires a contract that, among other things, specifically designates a fair and reasonable amount for the costs of all investigations services, whether extraordinary or not.
***