Advisory Opinion:
1263
Year Issued:
1989
RPC(s):
Subject:
Settlement requiring opposing counsel to sign hold harmless
The Committee reviewed your inquiry concerning the practice of a lawyer for one party, as a condition of settlement, demanding that the lawyer for the other party sign a personal hold-harmless agreement. The Committee was of the opinion that the inquiry does not present an ethical question but rather a legal question of whether a lawyer can be required to sign an agreement to do more than what the lawyer is legally obligated to do in consideration for payment of settlement. Since the Committee cannot render legal opinions, it could give you no further advice regarding your inquiry.
***